John 1:3 "without him nothing was made"
**Law VII (Actualization Requirement):** Potentiality cannot self-actualize; every actualization requires a prior actualizer.
Decoherence explains the suppression of interference, not the selection of a definite outcome. After decoherence, the system + environment is in an entangled state containing all branches—a "fat" superposition. Why we experience only one branch remains unexplained without invoking observation. Decoherence moves the problem; it doesn't solve it.
Even in many-worlds, branches must be actualized as experiences. The Born rule probabilities still require explanation. Moreover, "all branches real" is itself an actualization claim requiring an actualizer. The interpretation shifts rather than eliminates Law VII.
GRW introduces a new physical process—random localization events. But this process itself is actual, not potential. The "spontaneous" collapse occurs due to the actual dynamics of the GRW mechanism. The actualizer is the GRW process, not nothing. Law VII still holds.
Retrocausality (e.g., transactional interpretation) doesn't violate Law VII. The "future" event influencing the past is itself actual—it exists in spacetime. The influence is between actualities, not from potentiality to actuality without actualizer. The causal structure is unusual but Law VII is preserved.
Virtual particles are not "nothing becoming something." They are quantum fluctuations of actual fields governed by actual Hamiltonians. The vacuum state |0⟩ is an actual state with definite properties. Virtual particles are excitations of this actual vacuum, not emergence from non-existence.
The measurement process:
with probability P(k) = |c_k|^2 (Born rule).
This transition requires:
1. An observable \hat{O} with eigenstates |o_i\rangle
2. A measurement apparatus coupled to the system
3. An observer to read the apparatus
Theorem (Law VII): Let \mathcal{H} be a Hilbert space and |\psi\rangle \in \mathcal{H} be a state vector in superposition:
Then there exists no self-operation \hat{U}: \mathcal{H} \to \mathcal{H} such that:
where \hat{U} depends only on |\psi\rangle itself.
Proof:
1. Suppose \hat{U} is such a self-operation, determined by |\psi\rangle
2. By linearity of QM, \hat{U} must be linear
3. For unitarity (norm preservation): \hat{U}^\dagger\hat{U} = \mathbb{1}
4. Apply \hat{U} to |\psi\rangle:
5. For this to equal |o_k\rangle:
\hat{U}|o_k\rangle = |o_k\rangle (if c_k is the surviving component)\hat{U}|o_j\rangle = 0 for j \neq k (to eliminate other components)6. But \hat{U}|o_j\rangle = 0 violates unitarity (norm not preserved)
7. Therefore no such self-operation exists \square
| Domain | Mapping |
|---|---|
| Physics | Quantum Measurement Problem |
| Theology | Actuality Prior to Potentiality |
| Consciousness | Observer-Dependent Collapse |
| Quantum | Projection Postulate |
| Scripture | John 1:3 "without him nothing was made" |
| Evidence | No Self-Collapse Observed |
| Information | Information Requires Source |
Bridge Count: 7