LogicalNecessity · Chain Position 7 of 346

IT FROM BIT

It from Bit (Wheeler) - physical reality supervenes on information

Connections

Objections & Responses
Objection: "It's just a metaphor"
"Wheeler was speaking poetically, not literally."
Response

Wheeler spent decades developing the implications. His delayed-choice experiments are physical tests of the idea. The holographic principle (Bekenstein, 't Hooft, Susskind) puts it in precise mathematical form: S ≤ A/(4ℓₚ²) — entropy (information) bounded by area, not volume. This is physics, not poetry.

Objection: "Bits require a physical substrate"
"The bit has to be stored somewhere physical."
Response

Correct! This is exactly what [[008_A2.1_Substrate-Requirement|A2.1]] (Substrate Requirement) addresses. "It from Bit" doesn't deny substrates; it orders them. Bits are primary; physical instantiation is secondary. The substrate question leads to [[011_D2.2_Chi-Field-Properties|χ-field]].

Objection: "Realism — things exist before measurement"
"The moon is there whether or not I look at it."
Response

Bell's theorem + experimental violations of Bell inequalities refute local hidden variables. Quantum mechanics is incompatible with "things have definite properties before measurement." The moon's macroscopic stability is explained by decoherence ([[046_A6.2_Collapse|A6.2]]-related), not by pre-existing classical properties.

Objection: "What about dark matter/dark energy?"
"We can't observe these directly."
Response

We infer them from gravitational effects — informational signatures. If dark matter has no informational interaction at all, it is operationally non-existent. The "It" of dark matter comes from the "Bits" of galaxy rotation curves and CMB observations.

Physics Layer

Wheeler's Delayed-Choice Experiments

Original thought experiment (1978):

A photon passes through a double-slit. AFTER it passes, choose whether to:

  • Insert a screen (detect which-path information) → particle behavior
  • Remove screen (no which-path information) → wave interference

Key insight: The choice made NOW determines what the photon "was doing" THEN. The "It" (particle trajectory) comes from the "Bit" (measurement choice).

Cosmic delayed-choice (Wheeler 1978, realized 2017):

Light from a quasar, gravitationally lensed by a galaxy, reaches Earth. We choose NOW whether to measure which-path or interference—for photons that began their journey BILLIONS of years ago.

Jacques et al. (2007): Laboratory delayed-choice with single photons. Results: The measurement choice retroactively determines the photon's history.

Mathematical Layer

Formal "It from Bit" Statement

Supervenience relation:

Let B = space of all possible bit-strings (information states)

Let P = space of all physical configurations

Wheeler's claim: There exists a surjective map f: B → P such that:

\forall p \in P, \exists b \in B: f(b) = p

Every physical fact corresponds to some bit configuration. No "It" without a "Bit."

Evidence
Empirical Grounding
This isn't philosophy. This is measured.
  • Bekenstein Bound
Defeat Conditions

To Falsify This

  1. **Demonstrate a physical property NOT derivable from yes/no questions** - An "It" without underlying "Bits"
  2. **Show that measurement doesn't create information** - That physical facts exist independently of any questioning
  3. **Falsify the holographic principle** - Show that information content exceeds the Bekenstein bound
  4. **Refute quantum measurement theory** - Show definite values exist prior to measurement